· 2 min readsecuritymobile

Pressure to ban TikTok in the US keeps escalating

CFIUS scrutiny and talk of a forced ByteDance divestiture show the US moving closer to real action against TikTok.

The TikTok situation in Washington is no longer just background noise. What started as vague national-security grumbling has turned into an actual review process, and the options being floated go well beyond a strongly worded statement.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), housed inside the Treasury Department, has been digging into TikTok’s ownership structure and its implications for US users’ data. CFIUS technically got its opening because ByteDance acquired Musical.ly back in 2017 and folded it into what became TikTok — a merger that was never formally cleared, which gives the committee a legal hook to revisit it now. That review has been grinding along for months, but the pace of leaks and reports out of the White House suggests it’s reaching a decision point.

The headline development this month is that President Trump is reportedly weighing an executive order that would force ByteDance to divest its US TikTok operations entirely. That’s a dramatically bigger swing than fines or data-handling requirements — it would mean TikTok’s American business gets sold off, spun out, or otherwise separated from its Chinese parent company, or the app potentially goes away in the US altogether. Nothing has been signed, and details of what such an order would actually require are still murky, but the fact that divestiture is on the table at all tells you how seriously this is being treated inside the administration.

The India precedent looms large

It’s hard to look at this without thinking about what happened in India back in June. New Delhi banned TikTok along with roughly 59 other Chinese apps, citing sovereignty and security concerns not long after border tensions with China flared up. That was TikTok’s single largest market outside China, and the ban went into effect essentially overnight. It’s a real demonstration that a government can decide to simply switch off an app with hundreds of millions of users, and it’s clearly part of the backdrop for why a US ban no longer sounds far-fetched.

Whether the US follows a similar path or lands somewhere softer — a forced sale to an American company, stricter data localization requirements, an ongoing audit regime — is still an open question. TikTok has consistently pushed back on the idea that it shares US user data with Beijing, and it’s been trying to distance its global operations from ByteDance’s China-based teams. Whether that’s enough to satisfy CFIUS or the White House remains to be seen.

For the roughly 100 million US users and the creator economy that’s grown up around the app, the uncertainty itself is already a problem. Businesses and influencers who’ve built their livelihoods on TikTok can’t exactly plan around a policy outcome that could range from “nothing changes” to “the app disappears from US app stores.” I’d expect more leaks, more denials, and more escalation before there’s an actual decision — this is the kind of story that moves in fits and starts, not a straight line. Worth watching closely over the next few weeks.

Related posts

On this day in other years

Latest on Daily Signal

All posts →